Midterm Examination Solutions ECON 504 - Microeconomics II

نویسنده

  • Levent Koçkesen
چکیده

Solution The following is a Nash equilibrium: Player 1 calls and the other players do not call. Player 1’s payoff in this action profile is equal to v− c, and is greater than 0, which is the payoff he would get if he deviated and did not call. All the other players get a payoff of v, which is greater than the payoff that they would get if they were to deviate and call: v − c. Therefore, no player has a profitable unilateral deviation and hence this is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Find the symmetric mixed strategy Nash equilibrium in which each player calls with probability p ∈ (0, 1).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Midterm Examination I: Solutions ECON 504 - Microeconomics II

Solution We know that a strictly dominated action is played with zero probability in any Nash equilibrium. There are two pure strategy equilibria (M,L), (B,R). There is no equilibrium in which only one of the players completely mix. The only remaining possibility is both of them completely mixing. Let p be player 1’s probability of playing M and q be player 2’s probability of playing L. As we k...

متن کامل

Midterm II Answer Key ECON 504 - Microeconomics II

Solution The unique pure strategy subgame perfect equilibrium is (Rr, r). 2. (30pts.) An entrepreneur has a project that she presents to a capitalist. She has her own money that she could invest in the project and is looking for additional funding from the capitalist. The project is either good (denoted g) (with probability p) or it is bad (denoted b) (with probability 1− p) and only the entrep...

متن کامل

Self-enforcing agreement in cooperative teams: an agent-based modeling approach

Background Resource allocation in cooperative organizations can achieve long run efficiency (Chinn 1979; Dwight Israelseni 1980; Norman Cameron 1973; Putterman 1980). Given certain Abstract Purpose: In cooperative teams (such as agricultural cooperatives), self-enforcing agreement plays a critical role in guaranteeing members’ work incentives when the monitoring from a third party is absent. In...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008